Why did Dr BR Ambedkar clash with Mahatma Gandhi during the Civil Disobedience Movement?

 Dr. B.R. Ambedkar clashed with Mahatma Gandhi during the Civil Disobedience Movement primarily over the issue of representation for the Scheduled Castes (Dalits). Ambedkar advocated for separate electorates for Dalits, believing that they needed distinct political representation to secure their rights and address their social injustices. In contrast, Gandhi opposed separate electorates, arguing that they would further divide Hindus and weaken the fight for national unity against British colonial rule. 

The tension between them intensified in 1932 when the British government proposed separate electorates for Dalits in the Government of India Act. Gandhi responded by fasting in protest, viewing separate electorates as a threat to Hindu unity. 

This conflict highlighted the differing priorities within the Indian independence movement—Ambedkar’s focus on social justice and Gandhi’s emphasis on national unity—reflecting the complexities of the struggle against colonialism and caste discrimination in India.

SECOND METHOD FOR READ OR WRITE 

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar clashed with Mahatma Gandhi during the Civil Disobedience Movement primarily over the issue of representation and rights for the Scheduled Castes (Dalits). Here are the key reasons for their conflict:

1. Separate Electorates: Ambedkar advocated for separate electorates for Dalits, believing that they needed distinct political representation to secure their rights and interests. In contrast, Gandhi opposed this idea, arguing that it would further divide Hindus and undermine the unity necessary for India's struggle for independence. Gandhi favored joint electorates, which he believed would encourage social integration.

2. Social Justice vs. National Unity: Ambedkar emphasized the importance of social justice and the upliftment of the marginalized communities, while Gandhi focused on a broader national unity against colonial rule. Ambedkar felt that without addressing the issues faced by Dalits, true freedom would remain unattainable.

3. Fast unto Death: The conflict escalated during Gandhi's fast in 1932 to oppose the British decision to grant separate electorates to Dalits. Ambedkar's stance on separate electorates was firmly rooted in the need for self-representation. This confrontation highlighted the differing visions for the future of India regarding caste and social equity.

Ultimately, their clash reflected the broader tensions between the fight for national independence and the struggle for social justice within the Indian society of that era.